re chat ban

Dear Mr Hunt, Thank you for your e-mail. Our software developers have advised that your chat facility has been suspended indefinitely because of constant abuse of this system. Kind regards, DeanPoker ManagerLadbrokes Multi Player Poker




it the constant abuse bit i like

Post of the year i think LMFAO

Your pure class m8.

outstanding,

Nicely done hoooders! On the subject of chat bans my nephew -Marky-Mark- managed to get himself chat banned last night on Laddies also!

He deserves a mention for also taking his account, which he hasn't played on for ages, from £0.28 to £54 in a couple of days! Astounding work young man wd!

This is a travesty of the highest order ! !

Apparently he was abusing a frenchman from what I know, so no foul in my opinion.

Bainn wrote:This is a travesty of the highest order ! !

Apparently he was abusing a frenchman from what I know, so no foul in my opinion.

So Bainn doesn't think abusing men is wrong? Thought you were against that sort of thing? Remember you talking about sulphurous fires of hell and all that a little while ago! Ah well, nice to see you've come out the closet and no doubt we'll see you at the front of the next gay pride march!

khenny wrote:

Bainn wrote:This is a travesty of the highest order ! !

Apparently he was abusing a frenchman from what I know, so no foul in my opinion.

So Bainn doesn't think abusing men is wrong? Thought you were against that sort of thing? Remember you talking about sulphurous fires of hell and all that a little while ago! Ah well, nice to see you've come out the closet and no doubt we'll see you at the front of the next gay pride march!

Kenneth, at times your incredulous stupidity takes my breath away.

1) He was abusing a Frog, who are not classified as "Men", they're all bend over collaborators.

2) How can my comment be classed as "Coming out of the closet" ?

Think the cold has got to your brain.

Bainn wrote:

khenny wrote:

Bainn wrote:This is a travesty of the highest order ! !

Apparently he was abusing a frenchman from what I know, so no foul in my opinion.

So Bainn doesn't think abusing men is wrong? Thought you were against that sort of thing? Remember you talking about sulphurous fires of hell and all that a little while ago! Ah well, nice to see you've come out the closet and no doubt we'll see you at the front of the next gay pride march!

Kenneth, at times your incredulous stupidity takes my breath away.

1) He was abusing a Frog, who are not classified as "Men", they're all bend over collaborators.

2) How can my comment be classed as "Coming out of the closet" ?

Think the cold has got to your brain.

I'm with Painn on this one them frogs are a poor show and deserve all abuse aimed their way

Bainn wrote:

khenny wrote:

Bainn wrote:This is a travesty of the highest order ! !

Apparently he was abusing a frenchman from what I know, so no foul in my opinion.

So Bainn doesn't think abusing men is wrong? Thought you were against that sort of thing? Remember you talking about sulphurous fires of hell and all that a little while ago! Ah well, nice to see you've come out the closet and no doubt we'll see you at the front of the next gay pride march!

Kenneth, at times your incredulous stupidity takes my breath away.

1) He was abusing a Frog, who are not classified as "Men", they're all bend over collaborators.

2) How can my comment be classed as "Coming out of the closet" ?

Think the cold has got to your brain.

For someone who I remember being excited at the arrival of the sarcasm emoticon this particular reply is more than a tad disappointing. If you look up quickly you may just see the end of my post flying over your head.

CARNIVORE04 wrote:

Bainn wrote:

khenny wrote:

Bainn wrote:This is a travesty of the highest order ! !

Apparently he was abusing a frenchman from what I know, so no foul in my opinion.

So Bainn doesn't think abusing men is wrong? Thought you were against that sort of thing? Remember you talking about sulphurous fires of hell and all that a little while ago! Ah well, nice to see you've come out the closet and no doubt we'll see you at the front of the next gay pride march!

Kenneth, at times your incredulous stupidity takes my breath away.

1) He was abusing a Frog, who are not classified as "Men", they're all bend over collaborators.

2) How can my comment be classed as "Coming out of the closet" ?

Think the cold has got to your brain.

I'm with Painn on this one them frogs are a poor show and deserve all abuse aimed their way

Cheers Carnivore, at least there are some right thinking people around.

khenny wrote:Nicely done hoooders! On the subject of chat bans my nephew -Marky-Mark- managed to get himself chat banned last night on Laddies also!

He deserves a mention for also taking his account, which he hasn't played on for ages, from £0.28 to £54 in a couple of days! Astounding work young man wd!

they done a favour,never was the best keyboard warrior,and v nice work with the 28p kencos nephew,
and i think bain and kenny are secret lovers all they do BITCH,
my grammar better than your grammar,yawn the pair ya,

khenny wrote:

Bainn wrote:

khenny wrote:

Bainn wrote:This is a travesty of the highest order ! !

Apparently he was abusing a frenchman from what I know, so no foul in my opinion.

So Bainn doesn't think abusing men is wrong? Thought you were against that sort of thing? Remember you talking about sulphurous fires of hell and all that a little while ago! Ah well, nice to see you've come out the closet and no doubt we'll see you at the front of the next gay pride march!

Kenneth, at times your incredulous stupidity takes my breath away.

1) He was abusing a Frog, who are not classified as "Men", they're all bend over collaborators.

2) How can my comment be classed as "Coming out of the closet" ?

Think the cold has got to your brain.

For someone who I remember being excited at the arrival of the sarcasm emoticon this particular reply is more than a tad disappointing. If you look up quickly you may just see the end of my post flying over your head.

Nice attempt at an excuse.

the hoooders wrote:

khenny wrote:Nicely done hoooders! On the subject of chat bans my nephew -Marky-Mark- managed to get himself chat banned last night on Laddies also!

He deserves a mention for also taking his account, which he hasn't played on for ages, from £0.28 to £54 in a couple of days! Astounding work young man wd!

they done a favour,never was the best keyboard warrior,and v nice work with the 28p kencos nephew,
and i think bain and kenny are secret lovers all they do BITCH,
my grammar better than your grammar,yawn the pair ya,

Hush Geordie lad.

Bainn wrote:

the hoooders wrote:

khenny wrote:Nicely done hoooders! On the subject of chat bans my nephew -Marky-Mark- managed to get himself chat banned last night on Laddies also!

He deserves a mention for also taking his account, which he hasn't played on for ages, from £0.28 to £54 in a couple of days! Astounding work young man wd!

they done a favour,never was the best keyboard warrior,and v nice work with the 28p kencos nephew,
and i think bain and kenny are secret lovers all they do BITCH,
my grammar better than your grammar,yawn the pair ya,

Hush Geordie lad.

soz

Bainn wrote:This is a travesty of the highest order ! !

Apparently he was abusing a frenchman from what I know, so no foul in my opinion.

could not agree more,laddies never going to be the same

Dear Mr Hunt, Thank you for contacting Ladbrokes Poker. Having looked through your chat history you have had your chat banned 4 times in the last year and in all times you have had at least one warning to stop using obscene or abusive language or your chat would be disabled but you still continue to abuse both players and the manager atthe table. At this moment we can not do anything to get your chat back as it has been declined by the software developers twice already. If we can be of any further assistance, please contact us again and we will be more than happy to help you. Kind regards, AndreasNordic Poker AgentLadbrokes Multi Player Poker

Bainn wrote:

khenny wrote:

Bainn wrote:

khenny wrote:

Bainn wrote:This is a travesty of the highest order ! !

Apparently he was abusing a frenchman from what I know, so no foul in my opinion.

So Bainn doesn't think abusing men is wrong? Thought you were against that sort of thing? Remember you talking about sulphurous fires of hell and all that a little while ago! Ah well, nice to see you've come out the closet and no doubt we'll see you at the front of the next gay pride march!

Kenneth, at times your incredulous stupidity takes my breath away.

1) He was abusing a Frog, who are not classified as "Men", they're all bend over collaborators.

2) How can my comment be classed as "Coming out of the closet" ?

Think the cold has got to your brain.

For someone who I remember being excited at the arrival of the sarcasm emoticon this particular reply is more than a tad disappointing. If you look up quickly you may just see the end of my post flying over your head.

Nice attempt at an excuse.

An excuse for what? All I was doing was rubbing in the fact that you couldn't recognise sarcasm if it jumped out yer cornflakes and bit you on the ass!

Dear Mr Hunt, Thank you for contacting Ladbrokes Poker. Indefinitely means they will never reactivate your chat. If we can be of any further assistance, please contact us again and we will be more than happy to help you. Kind regards, VicPoker TeamLadbrokes Multi Player Poker

dont think they happy with me now

the hoooders wrote:

Bainn wrote:

the hoooders wrote:

khenny wrote:Nicely done hoooders! On the subject of chat bans my nephew -Marky-Mark- managed to get himself chat banned last night on Laddies also!

He deserves a mention for also taking his account, which he hasn't played on for ages, from £0.28 to £54 in a couple of days! Astounding work young man wd!

they done a favour,never was the best keyboard warrior,and v nice work with the 28p kencos nephew,
and i think bain and kenny are secret lovers all they do BITCH,
my grammar better than your grammar,yawn the pair ya,

Hush Geordie lad.

soz

Accepted lad.

khenny wrote:

Bainn wrote:

khenny wrote:

Bainn wrote:

khenny wrote:

Bainn wrote:This is a travesty of the highest order ! !

Apparently he was abusing a frenchman from what I know, so no foul in my opinion.

So Bainn doesn't think abusing men is wrong? Thought you were against that sort of thing? Remember you talking about sulphurous fires of hell and all that a little while ago! Ah well, nice to see you've come out the closet and no doubt we'll see you at the front of the next gay pride march!

Kenneth, at times your incredulous stupidity takes my breath away.

1) He was abusing a Frog, who are not classified as "Men", they're all bend over collaborators.

2) How can my comment be classed as "Coming out of the closet" ?

Think the cold has got to your brain.

For someone who I remember being excited at the arrival of the sarcasm emoticon this particular reply is more than a tad disappointing. If you look up quickly you may just see the end of my post flying over your head.

Nice attempt at an excuse.

An excuse for what? All I was doing was rubbing in the fact that you couldn't recognise sarcasm if it jumped out yer cornflakes and bit you on the ass!

You're attempting to call that sarcasm ?, the Highlands must have a lower level understanding of the concept, bless the backwards country.

the hoooders wrote:

Meh, prefer Maury.

Bainn wrote:

the hoooders wrote:

Meh, prefer Maury.

Never lower myself to watching such cack. Not surprised that you do though.

khenny wrote:

Bainn wrote:

the hoooders wrote:

Meh, prefer Maury.

Never lower myself to watching such cack. Not surprised that you do though.

Attempting sarcasm again ?