after 2 raises you went all in with 640, and had a KQ against my AK. you lost. you could have easily made the money back by folding, so surely incorrect to go all in after 2 raises before your BB? the blinds were still low enough for you to win. you would have been better going all in with a lower hand so you could hit something as it was obvious i had a great hand which most likely featured an ace, plus either king or queen.
i feel maybe you'd become obsessed with beating me by that point so went all in. is this correct or am i way off? i can not think of another reason for you raising all in.
as for the earlier hand when you hit a spade flush on the flop and i had 600 chips with a spade Ace in my hand. are you really telling me you wouldn't have chanced your last 600 on hitting a flush in a super turbo? i said "ul" to you but you called me a chimp... which is an interesting insult. chimps are nice
i'm interested to hear what you would have done in that last situation if you could enlighten me.
maybe others could let me know who, in their opinion, played these hands correctly. imo, we both played the flush hand correctly. and pokerkenny played the AK v KQ hand badly.
Thu May 29, 2014 1:45 pm by mikewashtm
» Betfair
Thu May 29, 2014 1:45 pm by mikewashtm
» anyone want to buy a % in me in sundays 40k on betfair
Thu May 29, 2014 1:44 pm by mikewashtm
» British open tips(betfair prices)
Thu May 29, 2014 1:43 pm by mikewashtm
» Pokerstars play money
Thu Dec 29, 2011 4:40 pm by jenny_kay1
» Where is everyone !!!!!!!!!!!!!1
Thu Dec 15, 2011 5:47 pm by jenny_kay1
» possible to be a good coach but losing player?
Wed Dec 07, 2011 5:07 am by albert1212
» which limit i should play??
Wed Dec 07, 2011 5:07 am by albert1212
» Why Poker is so popular?
Sat Nov 19, 2011 11:47 pm by artur11